|
|
Page Options |
|
|
CASE CLOSED |
MEDIATION REFUSED |
Nov 28, 2012 |
Upload File
Upload Image
Contact Agent
RENTAL DETAILS |
Address : 202 GOLDFINCH CT UNIT 201
City, State - Zip : FAIRDALE, KY - 40118 9186. |
COMPLAINT DETAILS (from renter) |
When I signed my lease renewal in January of 2012 there was an additional $20 water fee that was to be assessed per month based upon water usage. The water meter was to be installed no later than the last day of the month which would be January 31, 2012. The meter would be read monthly and based upon this reading I would be assigned a rebate which would go into a running total or be assessed a fee over the $20. This was the basis of the agreement between myself and Ms. Leslie Price acting as an agent on behalf of SCH Realty. As of the date of this complaint, 11/9/2012 no water meter has been installed. Ms. Leslie Price on behalf of SCH Realty the owners of Austin Park Apartments still refuse to refund me any money as she claims that even though the conversation took place as a consumer it's my fault for not putting anything into writing. My conversations with Ms. Price and her staff to my understanding have lead me to believe that their stance is that if nothing is written into the lease then under no circumstance does SCH Realty have to comply yet I still need to legally comply with the water fee or face further eviction processes. Ms. Price has reached out to me several time verbally but refuses to put anything into writing as to the SCH Realty's direct stance on this. Our verbal conversations has lead to my understanding the SCH will under no circumstance refund my unmonitored water fee on the grounds that ,"I just need to pay them, stop complaining, and understand that I owe them."
|
INVESTIGATING AGENT - REMARKS (11) |
Agent |
Date |
Response |
SYSTEM |
Nov 28, 2012 |
Case has been closed by Tenant request. Case dropped. Tenant states that the Landlord has been unwilling to cooperate. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 28, 2012 |
The tenant has closed this case. The RPA will no longer be accepting responses to this complaint. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 20, 2012 |
LANDLORD RESPONSE PAST DUE: The Landlord has failed to respond to the complaint by: November 19, 2012 .The Landlord will be provided a grace period of 3 additional days to respond. CASE IS PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 20, 2012 |
PAST DUE RESPONSE: The Landlord or Manger has FAILED to respond by the deadline set within the complaint notice. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE: The landlord or manager have been provided with the following response deadline: November 18, 2012
This deadline provides a reasonable time frame of 3 days for delivery of written notice and 3 days to respond to case # 23-0502 as outlined in the mailed notice. THIS CASE IS PENDING RESPONSE FROM LANDLORD OR MANAGER.
|
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
MAIL CONFIRMATION: The complaint notice has been processed and is currently in route for 23-0502. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
COMPLAINT NOTICE PRINTED: The complaint notice has been successfully transferred to the nearest mailing center and is pending mailing confirmation. For Landlord |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
AUTOMATIC EMAIL TO LANDLORD: The system has automatically emailed the landlord a digital complaint notice. Initial Email to Landlord has been sent. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
EMAIL TO TENANT: The system has sent an email to the tenant. The email included a copy of the complaint as filed by the tenant. |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 12, 2012 |
Complaint Accepted by System |
|
SYSTEM |
Nov 9, 2012 |
Complaint 23-0502 has been filed. |
|
|
|