Landlord Complaint Record: #23-1289

Cornerstone Apartmentrs    |    Andrew    |    San Ramon    ,    California 94583    Landlord Complaint 23-1289


Dispute or Remove Record
Page Options Page Options Page Options
  Print this page
  Email this page
CASE CLOSED FORCE REQUIRED Mar 26, 2013


WARNING! This property/ landlord refused to mediate a fair resolution or respond to this
complaint. Landlord refused to cooperate.
 



Case Number : 23-1289 Filing Date : Mar 1, 2013
Investigating Agent : Kept Private Case Disposition : Force Required
Complaint Level : Code Landlord Response : Case Closed

SUPPORTING DETAILS
Type Title / Link Posted By Date Uploaded Comments

LANDLORD / MGR : Andrew RENTER : Kept Private
Property Name : Cornerstone Apartmentrs      
Address : 2200 Brookcliff Cir Address : Kept Private
City, State - Zip : San Ramon, California - 94583. City, State - Zip : Walnut Creek, California - 94597.
Phone : Kept Private Phone : Kept Private

COMPLAINT : Andrews negligence
Fair Resolution according to renter :
  1. Financial and emotional restitution

RENTAL DETAILS
Address               :   1463 TREAT BLVD APT 1213
City, State - Zip   :   WALNUT CREEK, CA - 94597 7512.

COMPLAINT DETAILS (from renter)

I'm filing this complaint because Andrew, the sales consultant gave me wrong information regarding my mother's credit report. He had informed me that my mother had some outstanding accounts, and if I were to pay off one of the accounts (Sprint) she would be under the $1200 credit limit and would qualify as a resident at Cornerstone. I went ahead and made the payment to Sprint in the amount of $267, to qualify my mother. A few days later, he gets back to me and says, "oh, i was looking at wrong information. My system didn’t show the other accounts she had outstanding then, and I have now been informed subsequently she has been disqualified. My mother and I live together. She is a senior and a diabetic patient, and therefore has to be taken care of, that is why we live together. Therefore, I couldn't rent the apartment. Andrew wasted my money as well as my time, because I was waiting to hear back from Andrew, so I can put it 30-day notice at my current apartment (Country Brook Apartments) and move into Cornerstone. I had no choice to move out of that apartment and pay Country Brook Apartments $500 lease termination fee in addition to my monthly rent which is $1710. Due to Andrew's negligence, I had a very tough time financially these past two months. Also, Andrew took forever to get back to me regarding our applications. I had to poke, prod, and call several times and follow up on our paperwork. At times he seemed disinterested, and asked me several times about paperwork which I had completed already. I remember he asked me for my bank statements, days after I had submitted them to him. In another instance, he said he couldn’t find my paperwork. This kind of negligence is not done. When people are seeking residence leasing consultants should be sensitive to people’s needs and take the entire process of qualifying a resident seriously. Due to Andrew’s carelessness and lackluster performance of his duties as a leasing consultant I’m estimating my damages to be around $1000 not to mention the emotional stress this entire process caused. I want financial restitution and I want Cornerstone to hold Andrew accountable for his carelessness and take action to prevent this from happening to future potential residents. Due to the lack of affordable housing we had to move out of San Ramon and leave behind our friends and church. I qualified as a resident, and at the last minute, Andrew tells me that my mother isn’t.


LANDLORD / TENANT RESPONSES (0)
From Date IP Address Response

INVESTIGATING AGENT - REMARKS (10)
Agent Date Response
SYSTEM Mar 26, 2013 FORCE REQUIRED! After repeated attempts to resolve this complaint; management has FAILED to comply and requires force. The RPA has taken all reasonable efforts to contact the Landlord / Manager. They have REFUSED all request and will require FORCE. This case is closed with a negative disposition.

SYSTEM Mar 11, 2013 LANDLORD RESPONSE PAST DUE: The Landlord has failed to respond to the complaint by: March 10, 2013 .The Landlord will be provided a grace period of 3 additional days to respond. CASE IS PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE.

SYSTEM Mar 11, 2013 PAST DUE RESPONSE: The Landlord or Manger has FAILED to respond by the deadline set within the complaint notice.

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE: The landlord or manager have been provided with the following response deadline: March 09, 2013 This deadline provides a reasonable time frame of 3 days for delivery of written notice and 3 days to respond to case # 23-1289 as outlined in the mailed notice. THIS CASE IS PENDING RESPONSE FROM LANDLORD OR MANAGER.

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 MAIL CONFIRMATION: The complaint notice has been processed and is currently in route for 23-1289.

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 COMPLAINT NOTICE PRINTED: The complaint notice has been successfully transferred to the nearest mailing center and is pending mailing confirmation. For Landlord

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 AUTOMATIC EMAIL TO LANDLORD: The system has automatically emailed the landlord a digital complaint notice. Initial Email to Landlord has been sent.

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 EMAIL TO TENANT: The system has sent an email to the tenant. The email included a copy of the complaint as filed by the tenant.

SYSTEM Mar 3, 2013 Complaint Accepted by RPA and is pending further processing.

SYSTEM Mar 1, 2013 Complaint 23-1289 has been filed and is in queue for further processing. Pending further updates and confirmation of mailing.