smoking new tenant without consent- landlord says he’s done nothing wrong

By Tucker

I recently moved into a new place in salt lake city on a 6 month lease. I gave my notice of intent to vacate, 30 days later due to smoking on the premises, which I was not informed, either verbally or in writing, would be present when I signed my lease. 

I was initially gave me a tour of this residence and offered the lease on May 19th, 2010. Under the smoking clause of the lease signed, it states that smoking is prohibited on premises unless otherwise stated in writing by owner. As I was the first tenant to sign, the co-landlord asked if I had any general preferences of roommates. I stated that I had no preference as far as gender or lifestyle, but was adamant about no smoking due to severe asthma. Nothing was said about any other tenants (basement tenants) smoking, and since I was the first tenant to move in upstairs, I was under the impression that this was a smoke free residence.

 The first night I moved in on June 1st, 2010, I smelled cigarette smoke, which I immediately put to the landlords’ attention. I later found that one of the roommates who had signed onto this lease (after my request) is a current smoker. I cannot medically tolerate any form of smoke (inside or out). As I was under the impression that no smoking would be allowed, I did not believe that any smoke from outside the premises or from the adjoining premises drifting into the house would be applicable as well as a nuisance pursuant to Utah Code 78-38-1 (3). 

The landlord says that "my contract is not broken in any way and should be honored" and additionally writes that I "may or may not be charged for credit/criminal reports of the applicant or other related expenses incurred for replacing my occupancy." 

However, the lease has in fact been broken due to renting a room to a smoking tenant. Under Utah Code Sec 78B-6-1106, it states that a cause of action for a nuisance under Subsection 78B-6-1101(3) may be brought against the landlord if the terms of the renter’s or lessee’s contract provide the unit will not be subject to the nuisance of drifting tobacco smoke. Under the smoking clause of the lease signed on May 19th, 2010, it states that smoking is prohibited on premises unless otherwise stated in writing by owner. I was provided with no written notification of any smoking on the premises as outlined on the written lease. Not only was my request not honored, but in signing on a new smoking tenant without giving written notice, he has violated the terms of the lease agreement.

 

Also, as I was not charged for any credit/criminal reports/charges upon my own move in, I will not be liable to pay for one for the replacement tenant as well as any other expenses incurred, as I am not the one who has broken the lease. 

 


Am I right about smoking? Is having me pay for the new tenants’ credit report sort of landlord retaliation? Am I liable to finish the lease/pay future rent after these 30 days?

 

Edited on: Thursday, August 22nd, 2013 5:45 pm

3 Responses to “smoking new tenant without consent- landlord says he’s done nothing wrong”

My response: (We welcome stories, examples, explanations, answers and a touch of your personality)
 

James

July 5th, 2010 5:16 pm

Hi Tucker–

In Utah there is a smoke free act that landlords may or may not participate in. If the landlord has established a smoke free rental property the following would be true:

1) Smoking inside of unit would be illegal (not just a breach– it would actually be illegal due to the Utah Clean Air Act)
2) Smoking outside of unit / again, illegal.
3) Smoking in parking lot, or sidewalk, also illegal.

The problem is that if the landlord willing accepted other tenants that smoke, then it is clear that the landlord is not providing a smoke free property under the clean air act. IF the landlord advertised the property as a smoke free property, then he would be in breach according to the Utah Statute.

It appears that you are making the assumption that the landlord was providing a smoke free rental property due to the verbiage in the lease the prohibited you from smoking. However, the smoke clause in the lease is a generic lease statement that does not make the landlord automatically responsible to the smoke free requirements stated under the clean air act.

Think of it like this. If a landlord prohibited you from having a pet, does that mean that all other tenants can’t have pets– nope! The landlord can make that decision for each tenant. There is no such thing as a property wide lease standard. Meaning that every single lease can be different for every tenant, even if the apartments are identical. The rental contract is agreed by you and the landlord and that’s it. Whatever you agreed to is the law. (as per contract law) You had right to dispute the agreement or to clarify the agreement and did not.

I don’t see how you can try to hold your landlord responsible to the clean air act, if he has not agreed to be a smoke free property. All of my properties (in Salt Lake City) are part of the Utah Clean Air Act. However, not all landlords are willing to jump on board. One of the reasons landlords choose to not make their property “Smoke Free” is due to the cost to rehab an apartment that has been previously smoked in. Its much easier / cheaper to find another smoker to rent the apartment than it would be to convert it to a smoke free unit.

Your landlord appears to have multiple types of units. Both smoking and non-smoking. You still have the right to go after your neighbor for his smoke drifting into your unit, but you will have a difficult time trying to hold the landlord responsible for drifting smoke.

Not sure if you have much of a lease violation or not. Most likely not.


Glinda

August 17th, 2010 5:49 pm

Smoking in the vicinity of non-smokers, inside, outside, upside down is like peeing at one end of a pool. A tenant can have a pet and no one could know it if the owner is responsible. I lived in an apartment in a house, and smoke from other apafrtments was definately a problem. Umm! Second hand smoke. Umm, Umm! Stale, second hand smoke. Right and wrong aren’t always reflected in the legal system, I guess.


Sarah

April 28th, 2011 4:09 am

I currently live in an apartment where two out of the four roommates smoke inside. The last two roommates that moved in (me and the other non-smoker), were not told that cigarette smoking indoors would be in practice everyday, all day! I have addressed the issue verbally and even wrote letters to my current roommates. I feel that I should’ve been warned about this habit before moving in. I’ve had severe asthma since I was a kid and haven’t really had problem with it until I moved into this apartment. I’ve had two asthma attacks and have started spitting up yellow mucus in the mornings.

Is there any type of law in Illinois that can help me out in any way because apparently, the cigarette smoking indoors is not going to stop.


Close


Yes, the RPA® Can Help You!

Filing an official complaint is the nation's fastest way to solve tenant problems.

Not Ready? Learn more...

Virginia Complaint Filling Deadline  Tips/Suggestion

Need Help Filing Your Complaint?

Agents Available Mon- Fri 10am to 10pm

Recently Resolved Complaints:

See how the Nation's Rental Authority has helped thousands of tenants already!

Ask Question:

Post a new question to the RPA Tenants rights forum.

You Have Tenant Rights.
Recently Posted Questions:

Over 4,000 questions have been asked by tenants including these new posts:

Tenant Rights Categories

Popular categories about renters rights.