Landlord Complaint Record: #23-1072

Sotelo Apartments    |    Tre' Hutchins    |    Tempe    ,    Arizona 85281    Landlord Complaint 23-1072


Dispute or Remove Record
Page Options Page Options Page Options
  Print this page
  Email this page
CASE CLOSED FORCE REQUIRED Mar 26, 2013


WARNING! This property/ landlord refused to mediate a fair resolution or respond to this
complaint. Landlord refused to cooperate.
 



Case Number : 23-1072 Filing Date : Jan 29, 2013
Investigating Agent : Kept Private Case Disposition : Force Required
Complaint Level : Code Landlord Response : Case Closed

SUPPORTING DETAILS
Type Title / Link Posted By Date Uploaded Comments
upload Kept Private Renter Jan 29, 2013
Threatening comment made by Sunny Shipley (tenant in #4015)

upload Kept Private Renter Jan 29, 2013
This is a screen shot of the threatening comment left by tenant in #4015 (Sunny Shipley)


LANDLORD / MGR : Tre' Hutchins RENTER : Kept Private
Property Name : Sotelo Apartments      
Address : 615 E Weber Dr Address : Kept Private
City, State - Zip : Tempe, Arizona - 85281. City, State - Zip : Tempe, Arizona - 85281.
Phone : Kept Private Phone : Kept Private

COMPLAINT : Mismanagement and Breach of Agreement at Sotelo Aparments
Fair Resolution according to renter :
  1. Early release from lease at Sotelo Aparments without penalty.

RENTAL DETAILS
Address               :   615 E Weber Dr. Unit 3015
City, State - Zip   :   Tempe, Arizona - 85281.

COMPLAINT DETAILS (from renter)

Early in our lease agreement Property manager (Tre') told both Sarah and I that "This is not going to be another Grigio" (an apartment complex that rents to many college students) and that "Sometimes people sneak through" (speaking of their renting prerequisites and referring to the tenants in #4015.) MANY noise complaints have been made to the security company and to the office regarding the noise in the apartment directly above ours (#4015). No action has been taken to remedy the situation other than telling the tenants in #4015 to be quiet. The proposed solution from Sotelo was for me to call security or the office so that same action could be taken again. This tactic worked for a few months in 2012 but the girls quickly realized that they would not be penalized any further and calling security or the office became ineffective by fall of last year. Furthermore, I was accosted by the security guard one night when I called on them and told that hey had better things to do than respond to me. Since then, I have only physically seen a security guard respond to a call once. I have heard them call the tenants in #4015 on the phone from my balcony. To the best of my knowledge, they are not physically appearing for complaints. That is based on my making the call and looking for their car or security guard to show up on foot from my balcony for up to 45 minutes. Tenants in #4015 were placed on 10-day notice twice and I was told that if they violated the notice at any time that Sotelo would have grounds to take further action up to and including eviction. #4015 did indeed violate their 10-day notice but no further action was taken. More recently, Property Manager stopped returning emails. I left a voice mail on the mailbox for Resident Relations Manager, Laura Renfro and did not receive a call back. Last week one of the girls posted on Instagram (publicly) that she was waiting upstairs for us with a taser. I alerted Tre' to this very serious situation and did not receive a response. To date, no action has been taken against the tenants in unit #4015 despite their numerous infractions of the rental agreement's "Prohibited Conduct" section. Further, we do not feel that we are being provided a fit & safe home and that Sotelo Apartments is in breach of the rental agreement themselves. More information (descriptions, emails and pictures) regarding any of the aforementioned information can be provided upon request.


LANDLORD / TENANT RESPONSES (0)
From Date IP Address Response

INVESTIGATING AGENT - REMARKS (15)
Agent Date Response
SYSTEM Mar 26, 2013 FORCE REQUIRED! After repeated attempts to resolve this complaint; management has FAILED to comply and requires force. The RPA has taken all reasonable efforts to contact the Landlord / Manager. They have REFUSED all request and will require FORCE. This case is closed with a negative disposition.

SYSTEM Feb 9, 2013 Landlord Second response dead-line February 16, 2013 has been set for complaint 23-1072

SYSTEM Feb 9, 2013 2nd MAILING CONFIRMATION: The landlord has failed to respond to the first written notice and deadline. This is the 2nd and Final Notice being mailed to the landlord. The 2nd Notice is in transit and expected to arrive within 3 days. (2nd Notice and Final Notice)

SYSTEM Feb 7, 2013 LANDLORD RESPONSE PAST DUE: The Landlord has failed to respond to the complaint by: February 06, 2013 .The Landlord will be provided a grace period of 3 additional days to respond. CASE IS PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE.

SYSTEM Feb 7, 2013 PAST DUE RESPONSE: The Landlord or Manger has FAILED to respond by the deadline set within the complaint notice.

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 PENDING LANDLORD RESPONSE: The landlord or manager have been provided with the following response deadline: February 05, 2013 This deadline provides a reasonable time frame of 3 days for delivery of written notice and 3 days to respond to case # 23-1072 as outlined in the mailed notice. THIS CASE IS PENDING RESPONSE FROM LANDLORD OR MANAGER.

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 MAIL CONFIRMATION: The complaint notice has been processed and is currently in route for 23-1072.

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 COMPLAINT NOTICE PRINTED: The complaint notice has been successfully transferred to the nearest mailing center and is pending mailing confirmation. For Landlord

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 AUTOMATIC EMAIL TO LANDLORD: The system has automatically emailed the landlord a digital complaint notice. Initial Email to Landlord has been sent.

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 EMAIL TO TENANT: The system has sent an email to the tenant. The email included a copy of the complaint as filed by the tenant.

SYSTEM Jan 30, 2013 Complaint Accepted by RPA and is pending further processing.

SYSTEM Jan 29, 2013 New image uploaded by Tenant.

SYSTEM Jan 29, 2013 New image uploaded by Tenant.

SYSTEM Jan 29, 2013 Complaint 23-1072 has been filed and is in queue for further processing. Pending further updates and confirmation of mailing.

SYSTEM Jan 29, 2013 Complaint 23-1072 has been filed and is in queue for further processing. Pending further updates and confirmation of mailing.